Hvorfor bruker vi fortsatt CPUer i stedet for GPUer?



Hvorfor bruker vi fortsatt CPUer i stedet for GPUer? - Blog 2023
Hvorfor bruker vi fortsatt CPUer i stedet for GPUer? - Blog 2023
I stadig større grad brukes GPUer for ikke-grafiske oppgaver som risikoberegninger, væskedynamikberegninger og seismisk analyse. Hva er å stoppe oss fra å vedta GPU-drevne enheter?
I stadig større grad brukes GPUer for ikke-grafiske oppgaver som risikoberegninger, væskedynamikberegninger og seismisk analyse. Hva er å stoppe oss fra å vedta GPU-drevne enheter?

Dagens Spørsmål & Svar-sesjon kommer til oss med høflighet av SuperUser-en underavdeling av Stack Exchange, en community-drive-gruppering av Q & A-nettsteder.


SuperUser leser Ell holder opp med teknisk nyheter og er nysgjerrig på hvorfor vi ikke bruker flere GPU-baserte systemer:

Det ser ut til at i dag er det mange beregninger som gjøres på GPU. Tydeligvis er grafikk gjort der, men ved hjelp av CUDA og lignende, AI, hashing algoritmer (think Bitcoins) og andre er også gjort på GPU. Hvorfor kan vi ikke bare kvitte seg med CPU og bruke GPUen alene? Hva gjør GPU så mye raskere enn CPU?

Hvorfor faktisk? Hva gjør CPU unikt?


SuperUser-bidragsyter DragonLord tilbyr et godt støttet oversikt over forskjellene mellom GPUer og CPUer:

TL;DR answer: GPUs have far more processor cores than CPUs, but because each GPU core runs significantly slower than a CPU core and do not have the features needed for modern operating systems, they are not appropriate for performing most of the processing in everyday computing. They are most suited to compute-intensive operations such as video processing and physics simulations.

The detailed answer: GPGPU is still a relatively new concept. GPUs were initially used for rendering graphics only; as technology advanced, the large number of cores in GPUs relative to CPUs was exploited by developing computational capabilities for GPUs so that they can process many parallel streams of data simultaneously, no matter what that data may be. While GPUs can have hundreds or even thousands of stream processors, they each run slower than a CPU core and have fewer features (even if they areTuring complete and can be programmed to run any program a CPU can run). Features missing from GPUs include interrupts and virtual memory, which are required to implement a modern operating system.

In other words, CPUs and GPUs have significantly different architectures that make them better suited to different tasks. A GPU can handle large amounts of data in many streams, performing relatively simple operations on them, but is ill-suited to heavy or complex processing on a single or few streams of data. A CPU is much faster on a per-core basis (in terms of instructions per second) and can perform complex operations on a single or few streams of data more easily, but cannot efficiently handle many streams simultaneously.

As a result, GPUs are not suited to handle tasks that do not significantly benefit from or cannot be parallelized, including many common consumer applications such as word processors. Furthermore, GPUs use a fundamentally different architecture; one would have to program an application specifically for a GPU for it to work, and significantly different techniques are required to program GPUs. These different techniques include new programming languages, modifications to existing languages, and new programming paradigms that are better suited to expressing a computation as a parallel operation to be performed by many stream processors. For more information on the techniques needed to program GPUs, see the Wikipedia articles on stream processing and parallel computing.

Modern GPUs are capable of performing vector operations and floating-point arithmetic, with the latest cards capable of manipulating double-precision floating-point numbers. Frameworks such as CUDA and OpenCL enable programs to be written for GPUs, and the nature of GPUs make them most suited to highly parallelizable operations, such as in scientific computing, where a series of specialized GPU compute cards can be a viable replacement for a small compute cluster as in NVIDIA Tesla Personal Supercomputers. Consumers with modern GPUs who are experienced with [email protected] can use them to contribute with GPU clients, which can perform protein folding simulations at very high speeds and contribute more work to the project (be sure to read the FAQs first, especially those related to GPUs). GPUs can also enable better physics simulation in video games using PhysX, accelerate video encoding and decoding, and perform other compute-intensive tasks. It is these types of tasks that GPUs are most suited to performing.

AMD is pioneering a processor design called the Accelerated Processing Unit (APU) which combines conventional x86 CPU cores with GPUs. This could allow the CPU and GPU components to work together and improve performance on systems with limited space for separate components. As technology continues to advance, we will see an increasing degree of convergence of these once-separate parts. However, many tasks performed by PC operating systems and applications are still better suited to CPUs, and much work is needed to accelerate a program using a GPU. Since so much existing software use the x86 architecture, and because GPUs require different programming techniques and are missing several important features needed for operating systems, a general transition from CPU to GPU for everyday computing is extremely difficult.

Har du noe å legge til forklaringen? Lyde av i kommentarene. Vil du lese flere svar fra andre tech-savvy Stack Exchange-brukere? Sjekk ut hele diskusjonstråden her.

Populært emne